Mahaveer Palace, Near, Circuit House Rd, Ajit Colony, Jodhpur, Jodhpur-South (M Corp.), Rajasthan 342006, India
Location Map
Reviews
-
One of the finest lawyer in town. Not just his legal expertise, experience and knowledge but his dedication and dynamic approach are par excellent! Be it any legal issue he does not just give you sound legal advice but also reassure and comfort you! His cool calm nature makes you comfortable in any situation. Highly skilled professional with humane approach and strong grasp over subject! Highly recommended
-
Mr. Firoz Khan is a very great lawyer. He has helped me in my brother's case fully with all his professional expertise. Also he works on moral ethics which is great thing in today's world!
-
Pleased with experience Yes, Firoz Khan is one of the best Advocate. I know him and his team for last 2 years. What makes him so special, you might asking…? Well, first of all he is a “shark” in his field; as well as very punctual and professional advocate with tons of experience. He is well known as one of the best. If you’ll decide to consulting with Advocate Firoz Khan you won’t regret it. He helped me to close on my very complicated case recently.
-
Mr. Feroz Khan is the most effecient hardworking and fluent in his profession. I had been his client since 5 years and got brilliant results in all of my criminal cases in lower as well high court. He is very cooperative and kind hearted lawyer.
I engaged Firoz Khan, Advocate at the High Court in Jodhpur, for a civil appeal related to guardianship and international travel permission under the Guardians and Wards Act. Unfortunately, my experience with him was far from satisfactory. It took nearly three months to file the appeal due to repeated errors and non-compliance with basic High Court filing requirements by his office. These delays caused significant distress and wasted precious time. Communication was a major issue throughout the engagement—updates were never proactively shared, and I had to follow up constantly. Reaching Mr. Khan was extremely difficult, and on the rare occasions I did speak with him, he was unprofessional, abrupt, and dismissive. Despite charging a considerable fee, he did not demonstrate the required knowledge or dedication for handling such a sensitive case. I even had to outsource the petition drafting myself, as his office couldn’t provide a competent version. Eventually, I decided to transfer the case to another advocate due to Mr. Khan’s lack of professionalism and commitment. However, he refused to release the case until the full payment was made, leaving me with no option but to pay in full. Thankfully, after switching to a more capable lawyer, the matter was resolved successfully in just two months.I would strongly advise anyone considering his services to exercise caution or look elsewhere. ____ Your summary of points 1–6 is misleading and does not reflect the actual facts. I am therefore compelled to correct the record clearly for anyone reading this exchange. I categorically do NOT agree that “everything about the case was done by you.” Your office was unable to draft a petition that met basic High Court filing standards. Multiple defective drafts and registry objections made this evident. As a result, I had to independently engage another lawyer—at my own cost—to prepare a competent petition. That draft was then provided to you purely for filing purposes. This was not collaboration; it was damage control. Your portrayal of the fee arrangement is inaccurate. The agreed structure was ₹10,000 as advance and the balance after final hearing. Despite this, I was repeatedly pressured to pay the full amount while the matter was still pending. When I decided to change counsel due to persistent incompetence and delays, you refused to release the file until full payment was made. Payment was made under compulsion, not satisfaction. Communication throughout was consistently poor and unprofessional. Updates were not provided proactively. Follow-up calls often went unanswered, and when contact was finally made, responses were defensive, abrupt, and dismissive—particularly when errors and delays were raised. This behaviour is unacceptable in any matter, more so in a sensitive guardianship case. Yes, the draft came from me—but only because your office failed to deliver one. I did not “send a draft” by choice. I was forced to do so because your office could not produce a legally sound petition despite ample time. This alone speaks volumes about the level of competence involved. Procedural handling was neither efficient nor competent. Repeated filing defects occurred due to basic mistakes and lack of familiarity with High Court requirements. These errors caused months of unnecessary delay. Claiming that procedures were handled properly is simply false and contradicted by the registry objections on record. The favourable outcome occurred only AFTER I changed counsel. The matter progressed efficiently and was concluded within two months once it was taken over by a different advocate who personally handled filings and arguments with professionalism, diligence, and sensitivity. This review reflects my direct experience and is shared so others can make an informed decision. Anyone engaging legal counsel—especially in sensitive matters involving children—deserves competence, accountability, and professionalism. Unfortunately, my experience here demonstrated the absence of all three.